catherine-morgan.com

Links to all blogs by Catherine…and much more.

Entries Comments



Category: teens

Is Gardasil Being Over Hyped By The Media?

30 August, 2008 (21:25) | family, media, teens, Gardasil, Merck, women's health, political, life, BlogHer, women, children, news, Health | By: Catherine Morgan

A new question surrounding Merck’s HPV vaccine.  Is the media to blame for over hyping Gardasil?  Personally, I think there is enough blame to go around for everyone here.  But, the latest evidence is pointing to the news media sensationalizing the HPV and cervical cancer link.  Why am I not surprised?  Is there anything the news media doesn’t over-hype and sensationalize these days?

From The New York Times

Merck’s teen girl vaccine Gardasil has been under fire of late, with everyone from The New England Journal of Medicine to The New York Times questioning whether there is sufficient evidence to justify the widespread use of vaccines against cervical cancer.

“I think the company did a very effective job of glossing over these questions in its marketing campaign and convincing the public that this vaccine would indeed prevent cervical cancer,’’ said Dr. Timothy Johnson, ABC’s medical editor, last week.

Now, a pro-business media watchdog group has a new take on the issue. The hype about Gardasil isn’t the result of over-the-top marketing by Merck, it claims, but is instead the result of heavy promotion by the American news media.

. . .

The report cites several examples, including:

  • ABC’s Charles Gibson told viewers “this breakthrough couldn’t come soon enough,” on the June 8, 2006 “World News Tonight.”
  • NBC’s Brian Williams called Gardasil a “triumph in science and medicine” on June 8, 2006. He referred to Gardasil as “the first vaccine to prevent cancer” on Dec. 28, 2006, and urged parents to get their children vaccinated in many “Today” appearances.
  • NBC’s “Today” show co-host Meredith Vieira declared that it “could save your teenager’s life some day” on Sept. 15, 2006. She also told viewers Gardasil was one of the three vaccines kids “need.” Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC’s chief medical editor, downplayed criticism of the expense of Gardasil, calling the $360 cost “the best investment you can make.”
  • For “The Early Show” on CBS, Dr. Emily Senay said Jan. 1, 2007, that the “top medical breakthrough [of 2006] has to be the cancer vaccine for cervical cancer, Gardasil.”
  • The report also says The New York Times “glowingly profiled Gardasil” in an August 2006 story about the history of the vaccine.

Since then, the media tide has certainly turned against Gardasil, due in large part because there is simply more available information about its use.

It was just earlier this month, that I took another look at the safety issues surrounding Gardasil.  So what do we know?  We now know that we can’t trust Merck to give us the truth, because they are making bazillions off of Gardasil.  And, we can’t trust the FDA, because, let’s face it, we can’t trust them about anything.  We can’t trust the CDC for the same reasons we can’t trust the FDA.  And, now we know, that we can’t even trust our local and national news anchors.  What is the world coming to?

Who can we trust when it comes to Gardasil?

Read more »

Popularity: 5% [?]

HPV Vaccine Gardasil: Is It Safe?

12 August, 2008 (23:56) | family, healthcare, teens, Gardasil, Merck, vaccines, women's health, political, life, BlogHer, YouTube, women, news, children, Health | By: Catherine Morgan

This may come as a surprise to some…But, I haven’t been a big proponent of the Gardasil vaccine.I think if Merck had been upfront and honest about what this vaccine was, they could have avoided much of the controversy that surrounds Gardasil. Instead, in the name of profits, Merck has misrepresented what is an HPV vaccine, as a cervical cancer vaccine. Then, they proceeded to scare parents with their “one less” commercials, while also attempting to buy government mandates for girls as young as nine.

It’s my opinion, that parents should have the opportunity to understand the risks and benefits of the HPV vaccine, and the vaccine should be a choice, not a mandate.

The latest controversy is over the safety of the HPV vaccine.

Does the benefit of (maybe) not getting an almost always harmless virus, outweigh the risks associated with this vaccine?

Sarah Foster from Avalon Health Info

A recent publication by a conservative watchdog group has rekindled media interest in a controversial anti-virus vaccine and sent Big Pharma and federal health agency officials into damage control mode.

In a 25-page special report released June 30, Judicial Watch — a Washington DC-based nonprofit organization that promotes “transparency and accountability in government” – presents evidence based on government documents that in the two years since being licensed by the Food and Drug Administration, Merck & Co’s Gardasil, heavily promoted as a safe and effective vaccine against cervical cancer, has been connected with nearly 9,000 “adverse events,” including the deaths of 18 – perhaps 20 – girls and young women.

Amie Newman from RH Reality Check, doesn’t agree with the negative press (particularly this CNN segment) that has been surrounding Gardasil…

In what seems to be more like tabloid style reportage than journalism one might expect on this issue from CNN, the report focuses on half-truths and incomplete information to create drama around what is clearly a political issue for many. The reporter never explains whether Taqueria Williams received the full three-injection regimen or just the first.

The report centers on Williams who, according to her own doctor, suffers from an autoimmune disease the cause of which “cannot be proven.” It doesn’t stop the reporter from presenting statistics meant to scare with little fact behind the fear.

But, who is trying to scare who? Merck is telling parents, that by not getting their child vaccinated, they risk their child dying from cervical cancer. That’s pretty scary.

And yes, it is a political issue. Merck would like to have this vaccine mandated for all children. But, parents should have the choice to make an informed decision on whether or not they want their child to have this vaccine.

Personally, I think these reports of side affects are barely relevant, in comparison to all the other reasons parents should be concerned about this vaccine. Please watch this video, it sums up what I’ve been trying to say about this controversy from the very beginning…



From Bosses Blogg - Pushing Gardasil

Gardasil is an immunization against a “disease” that often has no symptoms and usually resolves itself. Marketers of the vaccine imply it helps prevent cervical cancer. This is scientifically false. Furthermore, cervical cancer is already substantially on the decline. What is true is that if you introduce Gardasil into a person who already has HPV you dramatically increase their odds of developing pre-cancerous cell behavior. So why are the marketers of this vaccine working with crooked politicians to make Gardasil injections mandatory for young girls? It’s garbage science and bogus public health all in pursuit of the almighty dollar.
From Nicole at Bellies and Babies

Their patient information pdf risks include:

  • pain, swelling, itching, and redness at the injection site.
  • fever.
  • nausea.
  • dizziness.
  • vomiting.
  • fainting.
  • Fainting can occur after vaccination, most commonly among adolescents and young adults. Although fainting episodes are uncommon, patients should be observed for 15 minutes after they receive HPV vaccine.
  • Allergic reactions that may include difficulty breathing, wheezing (bronchospasm), hives, and rash havebeen reported. Some of these reactions have been severe.
  • Additional side effects reported include swollen glands (neck, armpit, or groin), Guillain-Barré syndrome (which can cause death by cardiac arrhythmia), headache, joint pain, aching muscles, unusual tiredness or weakness, and generally feeling unwell.

Merck (the manufacturer of Gardasil) attests, though, that their vaccine is not to blame for these illnesses, including 10 deaths that occurred shortly after the vaccine was administered.

Hmmm… even though one of the risks that we know about can lead to death?

Did you know Erin Brockovich has a blog? The Brockovich Report: News-What You Should Know. On August 6th she posted on Gardasil

Gardasil, as you should know by now, is an HPV vaccine sold by MERCK, a vaccine with a flawed marketing campaign targeting young girls. The premise is that the vaccine will protect young girls from cervical cancer, as well as a couple of varieties of HPV. But the vaccine is NOT a cancer preventative, and it has not been thoroughly tested. Not only does Gardasil not protect everyone, it does not prevent all types of cervical cancer. According to current science, there are fifteen types of HPV associated with cervical cancer but Gardasil only counters HPV types 16 and 18. The vaccine requires three doses to start and scientists don’t even know how frequently boosters will be needed. They don’t know because they did not adequately research this before putting the vaccine out on the market using our young girls as guinea pigs.

Here is another informative video…


What do you think about the controversy surrounding Gardasil? Is Merck putting profits before the wellbeing of young girls? How do you feel about the government mandating this vaccine for school age girls?

Contributing Editor Catherine Morgan
at catherine-morgan.com, The Political Voices of Women, Care2 Election

Popularity: 16% [?]

Can The Movie “Mamma Mia” Relieve Stress?

2 August, 2008 (21:58) | thoughts, women's health, blogging, family, teens, mamma mia, depression, children, women, happiness, BlogHer, inspirational, empowerment, YouTube, life, Health | By: Catherine Morgan

Can a good movie reduce stress? I’ve always believed that smiling and laughing is healing in some way. And, there is a lot of evidence that supports that theory. I also know that for me, music can deeply affect my mood. Some songs are sad reminders of the past, and others are happy reminders of experiences I never want to forget. Seeing the movie Mamma Mia with my daughter, and listening to all the music, is definitely going to be a lasting and happy memory for me.

This is what happened. My daughter has been wanting to see the movie Journey To The Center Of The Earth in 3-D, and we’ve also both wanted to see Mamma Mia. So, on Thursday, we decided to see Journey To The Center Of The Earth. But, when we got to the theater we found out it was only in 3-D at “selected” theaters, and we weren’t at one of those. Mamma Mia was showing in the same theater about 15 minutes later, so we decided to see that instead.

To tell you the truth, I really didn’t think that either one of the movies was going to have much of an impact on me. I was feeling quite depressed, and was only taking my daughter to the movies because I thought that was what a good mother would do. [Without getting into too many details…I went right from Post BlogHer Blues and BlogHer Bolla, into one of the top mothering nightmares that parents can have with their teen sons. And, I’ve been going out of my mind ever since.] So, since I was feeling like a failure as a mother when it came to my son, I thought I shouldn’t my anxiety affect my daughter. However, I didn’t think anything, much less a movie, would be able to take my mind off of my troubles.

Thankfully, I was pleasantly surprised.

For me, this was one of the best movies I have ever seen. I laughed, I cried, I tapped my feet, and I even sung along a little. I really thought I was going to the movies for my daughter, but in retrospect, it was the best thing I could have ever done for myself.

So…My independent study, shows conclusively, that the movie Mamma Mia can relieve stress and make you smile. If you don’t believe me, go check it out for yourself. I enjoyed it so much, that I hope to take my mother and my daughter to see it again tomorrow. Mamma Mia therapy may not be the solution to my problems, but it sure is a nice temporary diversion.

Here is some of what other bloggers are saying…

From Sarah Seltzer at Reproductive Health - Finding Feminism Where You Least Expect It

Mamma Mia! might not be about feminism, or seek to advance feminism, but it takes many of feminism’s principles as a given, and works (or works it, if you will) from there.

Mamma Mia Feminist Creative Power Film

Mamma Mia! Here I go again! Okay it’s still running through my head and I have the urge to dance and twirl and sing through the house! haha!

Last night my daughter19 and I went to the movies to see Mamma Mia! It was so fun! Originally a broadway stage show based on songs by ABBA and now made into a movie starring Meryl Streep and Pierce Brosnon.

From My Little Black Book

Ok, so I went to see MAMMA MiA with my mom and feel madly in love. It was the most amazing movie I have seen in a long time, and I know exactly why. It’s the love story! They play it off as it revolves around Sophie, HA! What a lie! It’s about the mom being with the man she loves! I have seen the play 3 times, and the movie 2 times, and I was adicted to the sound track for a long time.

Jane Becker from The Dame Domain, compares the Sex and the City movie, to the Mamma Mia movie, in Deconstructing The Female Blockbuster.

This is not even a contest.

The women in “SATC” are a good 20 years younger than their counterparts in “Mama”, but they seem infinitely less happy. They sit around coffee shops and trendy restaurants discussing their unhappiness.

The women in “Mama” sing and dance. Christine Baranski kicks ass on the dance floor, Julie Walters chews through the scenery and Meryl…well, Meryl does a split in the air after bouncing off a bed.

When I grow up, I want to be them.

From Mommie Marzie

Last night I went to see the movie Mamma Mia with some of my sisters and nieces. It was so fun! I told myself “I will not sing along with the movie.” I chanted this in my head all through the previews. I was sitting next to my sister Tracy and she started singing. So I started too. My toes were tapping and I wanted to jump up and dance. I probably could have since we were sitting on the back row.

My sister Nann said she could see this turning into something like the Rocky Horror movie. Heck Yeah! I’d go see this and dress up in spandex and platforms and sing and dance along.

And, from my favorite 14 year-old blogger at Nicole’s Blog a review of Mama Mia

Yesterday, my mom and I saw Mamma Mia the movie! It was so great, that we plan to take my Granny to see it! The funnest part was knowing the songs! My mom and I were talking about how we just wanted to get up and dance during the movie, but we couldn’t because a whole crowd would be watching us!

This Christmas I plan on getting the Mamma Mia DVD for my mom!

From Jonotjoe’s blog

I am head over heels, send out an SOS, in love with the movie, the characters, the music and everything else in between.

From Taylor at Taylor Time

Today Mom and I went and saw Mamma Mia, and it was soooooo good!! Mom and I were both ready to turn around and see it again. I love musicals, and this one has become one of my favorites now.

From crashdummie

Am already humming ABBA songs and I think I might be close to serenading a friend with that song… again!

This post by Linda Merrill has some great pictures of scenes from the movie.

And, now after all this Mamma Mia talk, here is a great background look at Abba and Mamma Mia




Spoiler Alert — Part of the Dancing Queen scene, from Mamma Mia…




Another Spoiler Alert — This is part of The Winner Takes It All scene…



This was a great movie, and I saw it at a time when I thought nothing could make me smile. But, for a few hours on Thursday afternoon, I was happy, smiling, and almost forgot my troubles.

Contributing Editor Catherine Morgan
at BlogHer, The Political Voices of Women, Care2 Election

Popularity: 23% [?]

Take The Trans Out Of Our Fats

26 July, 2008 (03:27) | women's health, political, weight loss, diet, heart disease, teens, news, food, life, BlogHer, nutrition, women, dieting, children, Health | By: Catherine Morgan

Happy to report…I am feeling much better, and ready to talk about the ban on trans fats in California.

This is a trend I would definitely like to see continue. Nothing good can come from the consumption of trans fats. So, if foods we love to eat, can be prepared, and taste just as good without it, then I say…take it out!

Take the trans out of our fats!

From Huffington Post

California on Friday became the first state to ban trans fats from restaurant food, following several cities and major fast-food chains in erasing the notorious artery-clogger from menus.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed legislation that will ban restaurants and other retail food establishments from using oil, margarine and shortening containing trans fats.

In a statement, Schwarzenegger noted that consuming trans fat is linked to coronary heart disease.

From Sarah White at Calorie Counter News

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed into law a measure that would ban the use of trans fats in food products sold in the state. The fats would have to be gone from restaurants by 2010 and from bakeries by 2011.

Violators of the law would face fines ranging from $25 to $1,000. The law does not apply to prepackaged products from manufacturers, such as mass-produced baked goods sold in grocery stores.

Instead, the ban will focus on “food facilities” such as restaurants, delis, bakeries and cafeterias.

From Eater LA

In case you didn’t know: “Consuming trans fat is linked to coronary heart disease, and today we are taking a strong step toward creating a healthier future for California,” says the Governator.

Stephenie Cion wrote - Is Eating Out Getting Healthier?

I’m also happy to see that the laws are already prompting some restaurants to alter their menus, offering more healthy choices. I hope they can make these changes without sacrificing flavor.

A few people complain that New York City’s ban robs consumers’ freedom of choice (just like its laws banning public smoking). Still, the trans fat law seems to be a prudent measure; after all, according to the city’s Trans Fat Health Center, trans fats are responsible for at least 500 deaths from heart disease in New York City each year!

Pajamadeen wrote - Calgary’s Lower Trans Fat Restaurant Rules

If you’re eating out in Calgary, the New Year just became a little bit healthier. Starting on New Year’s Day, Calgary became the first Canadian city to regulate the amount of trans fat in restaurant foods.

This is from Erika Pitera and her post on Vitamin D and Heart Health

Some of the most common food sources of vitamin D include fortified milk, salmon, cod liver oil and sardines. By maintaining a balanced diet that limits calories, trans fat, saturated fat, sodium and dietary cholesterol, you may be more likely to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease.

Also See:

So…What do you think? Is it o.k. for the government to regulate what we eat? Personally, when it comes to trans fats, I think it’s a great idea.

Contributing Editor Catherine Morgan
at catherine-morgan.com, The Political Voices of Women, Care2 Election

Popularity: 34% [?]

Giving Children Cholesterol Lowering Medications?

8 July, 2008 (10:44) | healthcare, weight loss, news, diet, teens, heart disease, videos, food, dieting, life, BlogHer, nutrition, women, mommy bloggers, children, Health | By: Catherine Morgan

Childhood Obesity: Should We Give Children Cholesterol Lowering Medications?

I’ve written several posts about the epidemic of childhood obesity. Childhood obesity is very serious, mainly because of all the secondary problems associated with it, including death. Childhood obesity is directly related to poor eating habits, and lack of activity. So, when I heard that the use of statin medication had been approved for children as young as eight, I was quite surprised, and very skeptical.

This is the news clip I saw earlier today…



When I first heard it, it almost made sense. But, the problem with this way of addressing childhood obesity, is that you are only treating a symptom (in this case high cholesterol) of a much greater problem. Let me give you an example…

If you have a child that burns their hand on the stove, and the doctor tells you to treat it with burn ointment, that makes sense. However, if this is the tenth time your child has burned their hand on the stove??? Well, maybe it’s time to address prevention and not just treatment.

I really believe that we need to focus on preventing and treating childhood obesity, and the answer won’t be found in any pill. Lifestyle change and better eating habits are the only way to prevent the longterm effects of obesity. Here are a few sites that might help you improve your child’s eating habits…

From Kids Health - Healthy Eating

Nutrition Tips for Kids

From Mom to Mom - Unique Ways to Help Kids Eat Healthy

Tips For Children With High Cholesterol

From PBS Parents - Encourage Kids To Eat Healthy

Games To Get Your Kids Eating Healthy

From WebMD - High Cholesterol in Children

So, while treating some cases of childhood high cholesterol with statins may be appropriate, it’s far from a solution. I would say it’s like putting a band-aide on a gaping wound…But, it’s actually more like not even trying to stop the bleeding, and using blood transfusions to counter the blood loss. It just doesn’t make very much sense.

I’m not the only one questioning these new recommendations, this is from The New York Times

While some doctors applauded the idea, others were incredulous. In particular, these doctors called attention to a lack of evidence that the use of the cholesterol-lowering drugs, called statins, in children would prevent heart attacks later in life.

. . .

Other doctors said the recommendation would distract from common-sense changes in diet and exercise, which are also part of the new guidelines.

“To be frank, I’m embarrassed for the A.A.P. today,” said Dr. Lawrence Rosen of Hackensack University Medical Center in New Jersey, vice chairman of an academy panel on traditional and alternative medicine. He added: “Treatment with medications in the absence of any clear data? I hope they’re ready for the public backlash.”

Newsweek Health has an interesting article on the pros and cons of statins for children

Newsweek’s Mary Carmichael spoke with Peter Belamarich, a pediatrician at Children’s Hospital at Montefiore Medical Center in New York City, who has prescribed statins to some kids but takes issue with the new guidelines.

Did you hear about this? What do you think? Here is some of what others are saying…

From Angie at ParentDish

The AAP has also reversed its original stance against giving children under the age of 2 reduced fat milk. Higher fat milk was recommended because saturated fats are essential for brain development. “But now we have the obesity epidemic and people are thinking maybe this isn’t such a good idea,” said Dr. Frank Greer of the University of Wisconsin, co-author of the guidelines report, which appears in the July edition of Pediatrics, the group’s medical journal.
Young children are now getting the fat they need from sources other than milk and the updated recommendation is based on recent research showing no harm came from younger children drinking the reduced-fat milk.

Theresa from Poked and Prodded

Dr. Daniels says medication isn’t for every kid. “We are only talking about children who have pretty high cholesterol, cholesterol that would be high for an adult,” he says. Children who are obese and have diabetes or other risk factors are more likely to be candidates for medication.

“It’s a balancing act of risks and benefits,” Dr. Daniels says. At some point it ”tips in favor of being more aggressive in terms of treating those problems.”

From Mothership Meals

According to the article, children’s cholesterol levels have remained stable in the last few years, and their tri-glyceride levels have even dropped. So… what gives?

Meanwhile, according to this other article, also by Tara Parker-Pope, statins don’t even really work: “But many statin users don’t have established heart disease; they simply have high cholesterol. For healthy men, for women with or without heart disease and for people over 70, there is little evidence, if any, that taking a statin will make a meaningful difference in how long they live.”

In today’s article, Pope says that the AAP is also now recommending that one-year-olds with a possibility of developing a weight problem drink low-fat milk. I- I- I… I’m speechless. Well, almost.

From Mary at Fatosphere - Just When You Thought You’d Heard It All

Before I blow a gasket and become one of those obesity-related casualties we keep hearing about, I’m going to just go back to the specifics of this CNN article. Here are some things that are causing my left eyebrow to arch so high that it may just migrate right off my face:

(1) The AAP spokesdoctor quoted in the article, Stephen Daniels, “has worked as a consultant to Abbott Laboratories and Merck & Co.” — “but not on matters involving their cholesterol drugs”. OHHHHH, thank god he wasn’t working on matters involving their cholesterol drugs. Because you might think he had some impure motives in recommending his former employer’s cholesterol drugs to 8 year-olds if he had worked on matters involving their cholesterol drugs, but since he didn’t work on matters involving their cholesterol drugs, I can’t see any possible conflict of interest, can you?

From Dr. Molly’s Weblog

What this means for your child is that my nurse will be drawing (through a vein rather than a finger poke) a sample of blood at the check up if your child has been fasting overnight and I will send it off to the lab. If your child has an appointment too late in the day to do a fasting sample at the check up, you can either take a request to the lab and have them draw the sample any morning, or return to my office for a lab draw early in the morning. After sending the blood off, I get results in a day or so and will notify you by email of the results. If the labs are abnormal, I will also send the dietary and exercise changes that are recommended and I will encourage you to implement them for a six month period after which we will do the lipid panel again. If things haven’t improved significantly, then we will discuss the pros and cons of lipid lowering medications for your child. If your child’s labs are normal, we will repeat the levels in 3-5 years.

Its a lot to chew on but it emphasizes the importance of doing what we can to keep our kids at the lowest risk. 70% of children have some degree of atherosclerosis by age 20 and although the serious complications of high cholesterol may take decades to present themselves, the eating and activity habits we encourage in our children often last a lifetime.

From Kay B. Day at The US Report - Hype or Logic

I’m not even sure about the screening. Have numbers been adapted to children, and how do you measure those numbers against growth spurts, something no parent can predict the timing on? How about this money-saving idea? If parents have a truly obese child or a child whose screening shows high cholesterol, would a modified diet and exercise help? And more important, would a nutrition class for the parents help? You can find a lot of information about the food pyramid and physical activity at the US Department of Agriculture website.

What do you think? Is screening young children for high cholesterol really necessary? Would you put your child on medication for high cholesterol? Should more be done to help prevent obesity in children? Let me know what you think. And, if you’ve blogged about this, I hope you’ll leave me a link in comments.

Contributing Editor Catherine Morgan
at catherine-morgan.com, The Political Voices of Women, Care2 Election

Popularity: 46% [?]

What Is Your Favorite Sunscreen? Mine is…

3 June, 2008 (02:22) | thoughts, family, teens, catherine-morgan.com, women's health, blogging, life, YouTube, women, children, Health | By: Catherine Morgan

What Is Your Favorite Sunscreen? - by Catherine Morgan (cross-posted at BlogHer)

It’s summer, and that means it’s time to stock up on sunscreen. What’s important to you when it comes to sunscreen? Is it the SPF? Natural ingredients? Smell? Price? Are you hoping to prevent skin cancer or premature aging? Are you worried the chemicals in sunscreen could be just as bad for you as the sun? What sunscreen is your favorite? I’ll tell you mine, if you tell me yours.

Okay, me first. Here is the evolution of my use of sunscreen (formally known as suntan lotion)…

When I was younger, SPF didn’t mean anything to me, and my favorite sunscreen was Copportone, because I loved how it smelled. I actually would have preferred the scent of Hawaiian Tropic or BAIN de SOLEIL, but they were a little out of my price range back then. As far as SPF goes…2 was plenty, anything higher than 4 and I thought I would never tan. I eventually wised up, and moved up to an SPF of 8, and even though I still loved the way Copportone smelled, I started using Banana Boat and No-Ad products because they were cheaper. Once I had my kids, I spent the extra money to get them Copportone Water Babies with a high SPF, but I stuck with just getting whatever was cheap for myself. Now that my kids are older, we use the same sunscreen, so I always buy an SPF of 15 or greater. But, I’m not buying the Copportone or the cheap stuff anymore. For me, it’s back to being all about how it smells…And I love, love, love, the way Australian Gold smells, I started buying it a few years ago, and now it is all I buy. It’s not the cheapest sunscreen, but it certainly isn’t the most expensive either.

Not everyone is as concerned with the smell of their sunscreen as I am. Take Michelle at Chic Armoire for example, she says…

For the past 2 summers, I’ve used the Neutrogena Dry-Touch in an SPF range of 15 to 30. The formula goes on dry without an sunscreen smell (I hate the smell of Coppertone and similar sunscreens). It’s paba free, waterproof, and sweat proof. Note that the FDA is considering that the word waterproof not be used in the future. Water resistant maybe the replacement term. It also has Helioplex which is a broad spectrum for UVA and UVB.

Savvy Skin suggests…

There are probably 100 different sunscreens available at drugstores, but of those 100, there’s only a few I would bother buying. I firmly believe Zinc Oxide is the best sunscreen ingredient, and there are almost no drugstore sunscreens that contain decent levels of Zinc Oxide.

Blue Lizard is the only drugstore brand I currently buy. They have a few different products, and the Zinc Oxide ranges from 6%-10%, which isn’t spectacular, but it’s the highest concentration of Zinc Oxide I’ve seen in a drugstore brand.

In searching for posts on sunscreen, I kept coming across this video. I know I’ve seen it before, I just don’t know where. It’s more about inspiration and advice than sunscreen, but I thought I would include it anyway.



So, what is your favorite sunscreen? Why?

Is it because of the smell? The SPF? The price?

Contributing Editor Catherine Morgan at catherine-morgan.com, The Political Voices of Women, Care2 Election Blog

Popularity: 49% [?]

Emotional Health, Biopolar, and Britney Spears

2 February, 2008 (10:30) | teens, depression, biopolar, Britney Spears, family, healthcare, BlogHer, life, women, Health | By: Catherine Morgan

women.jpg

I think we probably have all suffered from some degree of emotional health issues in our lives.

Whenever someone talks to me about feeling depressed or anxious, the first thing I say to them is…you are not alone. We’ve all been there in some way or another. I also think that acknowledging you have a problem is half the battle. And that doesn’t make you “insane” or “crazy”. Really…How many “crazy” people realize they’re crazy? I think the most sane thing a person can do is admit they are feeling depressed or anxious, and reach out for help.

The Internet is a great place to get information, and there are a lot of sites with articles on dealing with stress and anxiety.

Read more »

Popularity: 54% [?]

Teens Driving and Twitchy Eye Syndrome

26 January, 2008 (17:35) | thoughts, writing, family, teens, women's health, mommy bloggers, life, women bloggers, women, BlogHer | By: Catherine Morgan

Teen Driving and Twitchy Eye Syndrome - by Catherine Morgan (cross-posted at BlogHer)

I’ve known this day was coming since the first day I held my son in my arms. The day he would start driving. I don’t know about other mothers, but this is sending me right to the edge of sanity. Since the first day (three weeks ago), I have had a constant twitch in my left eye. I don’t think it is a coincidence…I think it’s most likely an outward physical manifestation of my subconscious fears and anxieties over my son driving. I just made all that up, but you know what I mean, right? It’s what the doctor will put on my chart, just before they take me away in a straight jacket.

The best part is how my daughter keeps reminding me that in a little over a year, she’ll be old enough to get her permit too. Oh great! By then I’ll probably have twitches in both my eyes. Honestly though, how do parents do it?

The truth is, it’s not JUST that I’m a crazy, over protective mother. When I was in sixth grade, my step-brother was killed in a car accident…and up until that time in my life, I didn’t even realize that anyone other than ‘old people’ could die. I’ve since realized, that just about every senior class has at least one death caused by an automobile accident.

Years later, when I was a senior in high school, that person would be the girl who sat in front of me in accounting class. Then, about three years ago, my very close friend’s daughter was dating a boy in her senior class…and he would be the one. So, in my world, there is no pretending that these things don’t happen.

Even after all this, there is still a small corner of my brain that can still think rationally, and I know that both of my kids are probably going to be just fine. But, that doesn’t seem to stop me from worrying. And it hasn’t helped one bit with the twitch in my eye.

So, this post is my quest to try and find out how other moms cope with the stress of having a teen driver. It’s 2am here in crazy land, and both my kids are sleeping…I sure hope there are some moms out there blogging about this, I’d like to go to bed by 3am.

Read more »

Popularity: 52% [?]